Air Quality
All causesThis page will connect this cause to meetings, agenda items, votes, elected officials, organizations, and news.
Want ongoing monitoring?
Public cause pages are free to read and bookmark. Dashboard members can use monitoring and alerts for continuity across causes, meetings, organizations, and civic activity.
Civic activity
Follow the public records connected to this cause
These links use existing CivicCause relationships in San Leandro. Empty or unconfirmed sections stay hidden.
Cause summary
No local summary yet
No local summary is currently available for this cause in San Leandro. As local meetings, agenda items, news, and civic records are reviewed, this section will summarize what is happening here.
How to Engage
A simple look at where to orient yourself around this cause right now.
Latest update
Agenda item: Subject: $750,000 Bay Area Air Quality Management District Grant
From: Oakland Public Works Department
Recommendation: Adopt A Resolution: (1) Accepting And Appropriating A Reimbursement Grant From The Bay Area Air Quality Management District Transportation Fund For Clean Air / Charge! Program In An Amount Not To Exceed Seven Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($750,000) For Eligible Costs Associated With The Installation Of Fifteen (15) Two-Port Direct Current Fast Electric Vehicle Charging Stations, For A Total Of Thirty (30) Charging Ports, At The City’s Maintenance Service Center, 7101 Edgewater Drive, Oakland; (2) Authorizing The City Administrator To Execute The Grant Agreement And Related Documents; And (3) Adopting California Environmental Quality Act Exemption Findings. City Council recently discussed this issue.
Upcoming Government Meetings
Scheduled public meetings connected to this cause. Some meetings appear because their civic body has approved body-level Causes; the Timeline below is reserved for substantive civic developments.
No scheduled government meetings in San Leandro are currently linked to this cause in the next 6 weeks.
Cause Timeline
Substantive civic developments appear here when CivicCause has agenda, summary, minutes, news, organization, issue, or other evidence. Scheduled meetings are not added solely because of body-level default Causes.
No substantive civic developments in San Leandro are currently available for this cause.
Related agenda items
This list highlights the strongest recent agenda items where this cause is showing up in formal meeting business.
Oakland City Council
2026-07-21
S6.33: Subject: $750,000 Bay Area Air Quality Management District Grant From: Oakland Public Works Department Recommendation: Adopt A Resolution: (1) Accepting And Appropriating A Reimbursement Grant From The Bay Area Air Quality Management District Transportation Fund For Clean Air / Charge! Program In An Amount Not To Exceed Seven Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($750,000) For Eligible Costs Associated With The Installation Of Fifteen (15) Two-Port Direct Current Fast Electric Vehicle Charging Stations, For A Total Of Thirty (30) Charging Ports, At The City’s Maintenance Service Center, 7101 Edgewater Drive, Oakland; (2) Authorizing The City Administrator To Execute The Grant Agreement And Related Documents; And (3) Adopting California Environmental Quality Act Exemption Findings
Alameda County Transportation Commission (Commission)
2026-07-23
580: How will removing the truck ban impact future development? Will the increase in particulate matter in the air create more difficult conditions for development? At the very least it seems as if any large project that did traffic studies
Alameda County Transportation Commission (Commission)
2026-07-23
880: The researcher actually said air quality indoors is better in the summer when people open their windows to let the fresh air in! Caltrans should be more than embarrassed by the way their “experts” have managed this study
Alameda County Transportation Commission (Commission)
2026-07-23
880: The researcher actually said air quality indoors is better in the summer when people open their windows to let the fresh air in! Caltrans should be more than embarrassed by the way their “experts” have managed this study
Share